// Platform industry highlights

15 Feb 2017 Platform industry highlights

We’re in an extended lockdown phase as several platform clients will not be reporting their results to the stock exchange until March. That’s a pretty long wait so here are a few platform industry highlights to keep you going until the Fundscape Platform Report is issued. 

With the exception of DB pension transfers, investment sales activity was muted in 2016. Investors held back for much of the first half of the year until the Brexit result was known, and this had an impact on industry sales figures.

Industry highlights 2016

£bn20152016
Assets£402.4bn£488.8bn
Asset growth£56.1bn£86.0bn
Gross sales£93.1bn£93.8bn
Net sales£45.3bn£38.3bn
Net as % of gross sales48.7%40.9%
  • The platform industry closed the year with assets under administration of £488.8bn, up £21bn or 4.4% on the previous quarter.
  • Annual asset growth was more substantial at £86bn for the year or 21% — a good effort considering the FTSE All Share managed just 12.5% for the same period. Pension transfers underpinned the industry.
  • Gross sales in Q416 jumped to £26bn, their highest level ever, thanks to a higher volume of switches and transfers.
  • Despite the jump, gross sales for the year totalled £94bn, on a par with sales in 2015.
  • After three quarters of sluggish activity, net sales picked up in the fourth quarter and rose to £10.5bn, the highest sales since Q415.
  • But this was not enough to correct the balance — annual net sales of £38bn were down 16% on the £45bn achieved in 2015.

Product mix

 ISAsPension & SippsDC PensionsRestTotal
Assets£133.5bn£145.4bn£50.7bn£159.2bn£488.8bn
Gross sales£16.3bn£33.6bn£10.4bn£33.5bn£93.8bn
Net sales£5.2bn£23.7bn£3.6bn£5.9bn£38.4bn
Net as % of gross31.9%70.5%34.6%17.6%40.9%

As the table above indicates, pension business was the main driver of net platform flows. ISA activity was down in 2016 against 2015, but for entirely normal and expected reasons; during the first quarter of 2016, Chinese concerns spooked the stock markets and sent retail investors scurrying for cover. But spooked markets were not the only reason, pensions were another factor.

Pension flows were particularly strong in Q1 because of the widespread belief that Osborne was planning a flat rate of pension relief as well as reduce or withdraw tax relief on 25% lump-sum withdrawals in the March budget. As such measures are often introduced immediately, the race was on to get investors to maximise their pension contributions before the budget deadline. The net effect was that both advised and self-directed investors pulled money out of their ISAs to channel into their pensions. As we know, Osborne withdrew the planned pension changes at the last minute.

Bella Caridade-Ferreira
bella@fundscape.co.uk
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Send this to friend